Follow us on

Big Thinker: Temple Grandin

by The Ethics Centre
04 December 2018
BIG;
THINKER
Turning a perceived disability into a new way of solving problems, Temple Grandin has revolutionised the meat processing industry and changed the way the world views autism.

Temple Grandin (1947 - present) is an autism advocate and animal scientist who works to improve animal treatment in the livestock industry.  

Grandin has also changed public perceptions of autism, helping educators to maximise the strengths of those with autism, rather than focusing only on deficiencies.  

An animal lover and meat eater, Grandin has used her autistic trait of “thinking in pictures” to design livestock facilities and educate meat produces on how to minimise animal suffering. 

As a result, she says there’s been ‘light years of improvement’ in an industry where half of all cattle in the United States are handled in facilities she designed.

This isn’t enough for some animal rights activists though, who accuse her of trying to soften the image of a ‘violent’ sector. 

Thinking like a cow

Temple Grandin did not talk until she was three and a half years old. She struggled to communicate throughout her childhood, and other students bullied her at school.  

But there was one high school teacher, Mr Carlock, who saw something special in her. He mentored the troubled girl and encouraged her to study science. 
 
Shocked by the cruelty she saw in abattoirs, Grandin combined her love for science and animals by fixating on designs to improve animal welfare in these facilities. 
 
Grandin knew she learned better by visualising, rather than reading and hearing long strings of words. In this respect, her thinking pattern was similar to animals, who don’t ‘speak’ a language. 
 
She observed cattle in slaughterhouses, seeing how they responded to fear, senses, smells and visual memories. When cows can see they’re about to be killed, they panic, fall and injure themselves. To combat this, Grandin invented the curved loading chutes, which block their vision of what’s ahead, keeping them calm. 
 
This not only improves animal welfare, it saves producers the cost of cattle death, injury and bruising – which also reduces the quality of meat. 
 
Grandin has spent her career designing livestock facilities to improve the way animals are treated. 
 
In 1997, she worked with McDonalds after activists exposed animal torture on their production plants. She helped the fast food chain clean up cruel practices and restore its public image. 
 
In 2010, Time Magazine named her one of the 100 most influential people in the world for her work in animal welfare. 

We need autistic minds 

Grandin has also changed public perceptions of autism, a condition relatively unknown when she grew up. 
 
She argues people on the autism spectrum – who tend to struggle with verbal communication but think in pictures – can provide more insight in certain fields than those who think in a more conventional mathematical way.

Visual thinking is an asset for an equipment designer. I am able to ‘see’ how all parts of a project will fit together and see potential problems

 
Grandin encourages teachers to develop the strengths of autistic children, and has devised clever ways to combat perceived flaws. 
 
Like many on the spectrum, she is oversensitive to touch. “I always hated to be hugged”, she says.
 
So at age 18, she built a ‘squeeze machine’ – two hinged wooden boards lined with foam rubber, which allows users to control the amount and duration of pressure applied. Therapy programs across the United States continue to utilise squeeze machines, with research showing they help relieve stress in users.

Sleeping with the enemy

While a hero to the autism community, Grandin’s work divides animal welfare activists. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animal (PETA), the world’s largest animal rights group, appreciate and publish her work. 

Others, like biologist Marc Bekoff, have a beef with her getting in bed with an industry that kills animals so humans can eat them. 

“No animal who winds up in the factory farm production line has a good or even moderately good life.” – Marc Bekoff

Grandin’s retort is that without meat eaters, farm animals would have no life at all. She argues if animals are going to die anyway, it’s important to minimise their suffering.  
 
Does this apply to humans too? 
 
The New York Timesonce asked her if she’d consider helping to make capital punishment more humane. Her response was blunt. 

“I have read things about the malfunctions of the electric chair… I know how to fix it, but I will not use my knowledge to have any involvement in that. I will not cross the species barrier to help kill people. Period.”

  Follow The Ethics Centre on TwitterFacebookInstagram and LinkedIn.